2023 Proposed Social Security Payroll Tax Cap – American Social Security recipients could experience a 25% reduction in their monthly benefits in the coming years if nothing is done to reverse the current trend. This is due to the potential for the Social Security trust fund reserves to run out of money during the upcoming ten years. According to some experts, increasing the Social Security payroll tax cap could aid in the problem’s resolution.
The largest program in the federal budget, Social Security accounts for approximately a quarter of all spending. Nearly 90% of people over the age of 65 who live in the United States, or 15% of the population, receive benefits from it. (Image courtesy of www.gobankingrates.com)
At the moment, employees contribute 6.2% of their salaries, and their employers match that amount. However, incomes above the $160,200 income threshold are exempt from taxation (a threshold that about 6% of wage employees reach).
What is Social Security Payroll Tax Cap?
Payroll taxes, also known as Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes, make up the majority of taxes and are the main source of funding for Social Security. FICA taxes are 7.65 percent of salaries paid by both employers and employees; the 6.2 percent contribution to Social Security is only deducted up to a maximum amount, or income limit, that is decided yearly.
The taxable maximum or Social Security payroll tax cap refers to the upper limit on annual earnings that are subject to Social Security taxes. That ceiling is increased by $13,200 to $160,200 for 2023 from what it was in the previous year. The first $3,000 of earnings were exempt from the Social Security tax when it was first enacted by law (equal to around $56,000 in 2021 values).
Since 1975, the annual rise in the taxable maximum has generally been based on an index of average national wages. Approximately 6% of people who are employed make more money than what is taxable.
Read Also: Looming Insolvency Of Social Security – Experts Propose A Tax Cap
Should we eliminate or increase Social Security Payroll Tax Cap?
To strengthen Social Security’s finances, a variety of suggestions to raise, remove, or otherwise modify the payroll tax cap have been made.
The Social Security 2100 Act is an illustration of one such plan. It would impose the Social Security payroll tax cap on wages above $400,000 in addition to those below the existing maximum taxable amount. Over time, when the maximum taxable amount rises and the $400,000 barrier stays the same, the difference between the two would get smaller. The so-called “donut hole” would be used to progressively boost program income over time without immediately raising taxes on earners who fall within it.
Economists predict that it would take between 20 and 30 years for the doughnut hole to disappear, however specific estimates may vary depending on projected wage trends and the particulars of each proposal. This strategy aims to increase the tax burden on Americans with higher incomes in order to make the tax more progressive.
The trust fund reserves could be replenished and the program could continue to operate at full capacity for at least another ten years by raising the income threshold to $250,000 (or more) or eliminating it completely. Additionally, by doing this, a portion of the cost of funding Social Security would be transferred from the middle class to affluent, high-wage earners.
The current effective Social Security payroll tax rate for persons making more than the threshold is 1% or less. However, individuals whose incomes fall below the cap are forced to pay a six-fold higher price.
Pros and Cons of eliminating or increasing Social Security Payroll Tax Cap
The tax would be less regressive, according to those who favor raising or getting rid of the Social Security payroll tax cap, and it would also help to bolster the Social Security trust funds. If benefits are not increased to reflect tax payments, critics claim that raising or lowering the Social Security payroll tax cap could erode the connection between what people pay in Social Security taxes and what they receive in retirement benefits.
The argument put up by critics is that while low-wage employees may contribute a larger percentage of their income to Social Security payroll taxes than do those who are wealthier, they also get a disproportionate amount of government transfers that are exempt from the tax. Some economists predict that if the cap were raised, businesses and workers would retaliate by switching from taxable remuneration to compensation that is subject to a lower tax rate.
One of several options for enhancing Social Security’s financial outlook is raising or removing the payroll tax cap; yet, it is obvious that some kind of action must be made to assure the survival of this critically important program.
Read Also: Washington Must Save Social Security. One Idea Could Work
